Presenter Information

Amy L. Bone

Department

Psychological Science

Research Advisor

Sharpsteen, Don

Advisor's Department

Psychological Science

Abstract

This study examined the idea that the importance of various characteristics to determining the quality of reputations differs for men and women in ways consistent with their mating-relevant concerns. Based on earlier work, I first wanted to identify dimensions along which reputations might be judged. One hundred students were asked to sort ninety-one characteristics of reputations into sets of characteristics they saw as similar to each other. A cluster analysis of the resulting co-occurrence matrix produced twenty-three distinct clusters. These clusters were used as the basis for creating reputation scales from participants' ratings of the importance of each characteristic to both men's and women's reputations. Participants consistently rated characteristics as more important to the other sex's reputation than to their own, suggesting that reputations serve mating-relevant functions (at least in a college-aged sample), but there were few other effects.

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Document Type

Presentation

Presentation Date

2004-2005

Share

COinS