Abstract
Atrazine is one of the most commonly used herbicides in the United States, therefore it is a regulatory concern and is extensively monitored in the environment, especially in drinking water. Because of the higher costs of gas chromatography (GC) methods, utility managers and regulators are considering the increased use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods for monitoring atrazine. an ELISA test kit was recently approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency. the research in this article points out potential biases and inaccuracies that may occur with such test kits. ELISA test kits for atrazine are typically precise (repeatable) but often have a tendency for a positive bias from unknown interferences. Negative biases are also observed in some cases, which suggest a lower atrazine concentration than is actually present. the results of this research can help utilities and regulators to better determine the best use of ELISA versus GC methods for analyzing atrazine with respect to monitoring and/or process control.
Recommended Citation
C. D. Adams et al., "Accuracy and Interferences for Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay Tests for Atrazine," Journal / American Water Works Association, vol. 96, no. 12, American Water Works Association, Jan 2004.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2004.tb10764.x
Department(s)
Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
0003-150X
Document Type
Article - Journal
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2024 American Water Works Association, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Jan 2004
Included in
Architectural Engineering Commons, Chemistry Commons, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons