A Comparison and Analysis of Detection Methods for the Measurement of Production in a Boundary Layer
Alternative Title
Comparison of Visual and Conditioned Sampling Techniques
Abstract
Two hot films and dye visualizations have been employed, simultaneously, in a turbulent boundary layer to explore the relations among visual observations and five kinds of detection methods using conditional sampling. The results show that all methods correlate positively with each other, but not with high enough values of correlation coefficients to indicate true correspondence between any two thus far studied. Moreover, none of the detection methods devised to date indicate a plateau in number of events as a function of trigger threshold.
The results also provide additional information on several other matters: (i) the relationship of outward motions from the wall (bursts) to inward motions (sweeps); (ii) further details on the time and space location of periods of high uv-product with respect to the visual models and to fluctuation hodograph quadrant, and (iii) some data bearing on the transfer of energy in the frequency domain during turbulence production (cascade processes). The present paper emphasizes the relations among the various detection methods and visual observations during intervals of high uv-product; other results are reported in more detail elsewhere.
Recommended Citation
Offen, G. R. and Kline, S. J., "A Comparison and Analysis of Detection Methods for the Measurement of Production in a Boundary Layer" (1973). Symposia on Turbulence in Liquids. 119.
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/sotil/119
Meeting Name
3rd Biennial Symposium on Turbulence in Liquids (1973: Sep., Rolla, MO)
Department(s)
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
Document Type
Article - Conference proceedings
Presentation Type
Invited Lecturer
Session
Conditioned-Signal Analysis
Document Version
Final Version
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 1973 University of Missouri--Rolla, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Jan 1973
Comments
The work reported here was performed under the joint sponsorship of the National Science Foundation, Grant GK-27334, and the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Mechanics Division Contract AF-F44620-C-0010.