Application of Discrete Event Simulation in Optimising Coal Mine Room-And-Pillar Panel Width: A Case Study
Abstract
A key design aspect of room-and-pillar coal mines is the panel width (or number of entries in a panel), which affects unit mining costs and productivity. Traditional mine design approaches do not facilitate optimisation of unit mining costs and productivity as a function of the panel width. Discrete event simulation can be used to facilitate optimal panel width selection that minimises unit mining costs and maximises productivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of panel width on the cost and productivity of a room-and-pillar operation using discrete event simulation. The mining system is modelled as a discrete event model that estimates unit costs and productivity for a given panel width (number of entries). Data from a real-life mine is used to validate the model in Arena®. An optimal panel width is recommended based on simulation results.
Recommended Citation
A. Anani et al., "Application of Discrete Event Simulation in Optimising Coal Mine Room-And-Pillar Panel Width: A Case Study," Mining Technology: Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A, vol. 126, no. 1, Taylor & Francis, Jan 2017.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14749009.2016.1195035
Department(s)
Mining Engineering
Keywords and Phrases
Coal; Coal mines; Cost benefit analysis; Costs; Discrete event simulation; Intelligent systems; Monte Carlo methods; Productivity; Discrete event models; Mine designs; Mining cost; Mining systems; Optimisations; Panel width; Pillar coal; Simulation analysis; Room and pillar mining; Fleet size optimisation; Monte Carlo simulation; Panel width optimisation; Productivity; Room-and-pillar mining; Simulation analysis program
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
1474-9009
Document Type
Article - Journal
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2017 Taylor & Francis, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Jan 2017
Comments
This work was supported by Illinois clean coal institute [13/3B-1].