Individual Preferences for Mineral Resource Development: Perspectives from an Urban Population in the United States
Abstract
The literature on mining community preferences for mineral development, which is the basis for engaging local communities, mainly focuses on rural communities, and may not provide enough insight into an urban community's needs, concerns, and preferences. To bridge this gap, this work uses Salt Lake City, Utah in the United States of America (USA) as a case study to understand an urban population's preferences for mineral resource development. The work considered 16 mining project attributes and four demographic factors (gender, age, education, and income), which have previously been identified as important for explaining individual preferences for mining projects in the USA. The study recruited 628 participants from Salt Lake City to participate in a survey and used a discrete choice model to examine their preferences.
The results show that 15 of the 16 attributes have statistically significant influence on the preferences of these urban dwellers. The probability of the respondents preferring mineral development increases with job opportunities, availability of independent information, income increase, infrastructure improvement, and mine buffer but decreases with noise pollution, air pollution, increase in housing costs, and crime increase. Older, male respondents with higher levels of income and education are more likely to prefer mineral development. The issues that drive the preferences of these urban dwellers are generally similar to those of rural dwellers. However, the study finds that job and housing cost are more important for our urban dwellers than for rural dwellers in other studies. The results suggests that our respondents prefer mines with longer lives.
Recommended Citation
S. Que et al., "Individual Preferences for Mineral Resource Development: Perspectives from an Urban Population in the United States," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 189, pp. 30 - 39, Elsevier, Jul 2018.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.045
Department(s)
Mining Engineering
Second Department
Mathematics and Statistics
Third Department
Psychological Science
Keywords and Phrases
Individual preferences; Discrete choice experiment; Sustainable mining; Stakeholder analysis
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
0959-6526; 1879-1786
Document Type
Article - Journal
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2018 Elsevier, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Jul 2018
Comments
This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJ 1705146 and KJ1400326), Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University (Grant No. SLK2017A04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51504045 and 51604051), the National Key Research Program of China (2016YFC0402103), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project No.106112016CDJXY24005).