Correction: Residual Stress Distribution, Distortion, And Crack Initiation In Conventional And Intensive Quench Practices (Journal Of Materials Engineering And Performance, (2024), 33, 8, (3838-3848), 10.1007/s11665-023-08985-0)
Abstract
The version of the article originally published contained calculation errors. In Section 3.1, "The draft tube modeling showed more average distortion, 1.7% (%change in the fork gap opening) in the x-direction, compared to the spray quench modeling result, 0.9%" has been corrected to "The draft tube modeling showed more average distortion, 3.4% (%change in the fork gap opening) in the x-direction, compared to the spray quench modeling result, 1.8%." In section 3.1, Page 5, use of tenses was corrected: "Rule of additivity is utilized to transform the TTT curve to a cooling transformation curve for every time step during the simulation process. For martensite formation, a Koistinen–Marburger's relation is utilized (Ref 26, 27):" "Volume changes are considered in the simulation and included for the structural calculation of the stresses. The values of volume changes are based on the experimental dilatometric data available in the DANTE database, and corrected for the simulation, based on phase transformation." Was changed to: "Rule of additivity was utilized to transform the TTT curve to a cooling transformation curve for every time step during the simulation process. For martensite formation, a Koistinen–Marburger's relation was utilized (Ref 26, 27):" "Volume changes were considered in the simulation and included for the structural calculation of the stresses. The values of volume changes were based on the experimental dilatometric data available in the DANTE database, and corrected for the simulation, based on phase transformation." In Section 3.4, "DANTE simulation predicted twice the percent change in the fork gap opening along the x-direction in the spray quench modeling (0.9%) for the draft tube modeling result (1.7%)" has been corrected to "DANTE simulation predicted almost twice the percent change in the fork gap opening along the x-direction in the spray quench modeling (1.8%) for the draft tube modeling result (3.4%)." Corrections to the language have also been made after publication. In the abstract, "areas of large tensile stress concentration" has been corrected to "areas of high tensile stress concentration"; in the caption for Fig. 5, the phrase "and the d-spacing" has been removed; and in the caption for Fig. 6(b), the phrase "of the IQ tank" has been added.
Recommended Citation
K. T. Amatanweze et al., "Correction: Residual Stress Distribution, Distortion, And Crack Initiation In Conventional And Intensive Quench Practices (Journal Of Materials Engineering And Performance, (2024), 33, 8, (3838-3848), 10.1007/s11665-023-08985-0)," Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Springer; ASM International, Jan 2026.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-026-13634-3
Department(s)
Materials Science and Engineering
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
1544-1024; 1059-9495
Document Type
Article - Journal
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2026 Springer; ASM International, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Jan 2026
