Integrating axiomatic design and robust design

Author

Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta Tadepalli

Abstract

"In this thesis, three publications are presented that evaluate two design methodologies, Robust Design and Axiomatic Design, and give a detailed comparison of both methodologies. The comparison lies on the fundamental presumption that both the design methodologies address the system Concept Design as well as Product Design"--Abstract, page iv.

Advisor(s)

Ragsdell, K. M.

Committee Member(s)

Takai, Shun
Grasman, Scott E. (Scott Erwin)

Department(s)

Engineering Management and Systems Engineering

Degree Name

M.S. in Engineering Management

Publisher

University of Missouri--Rolla

Publication Date

Fall 2007

Journal article titles appearing in thesis/dissertation

• Quality systems and tools - an organizational perspective
• Similarities and differences between axiomatic design and robust design
• Integrating assembly feasibility with information axiom and quality loss function

Pagination

xi, 75 pages

Rights

© 2007 Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta Tadepalli, All rights reserved.

Document Type

Thesis - Citation

File Type

text

Language

English

Subject Headings

Axiomatic set theory -- Evaluation
Engineering -- Quality control
Engineering design -- Evaluation
New products -- Development

Thesis Number

T 9150

Print OCLC #

173491310

Link to Catalog Record

Full-text not available: Request this publication directly from Missouri S&T Library or contact your local library.

Recommended Citation

Tadepalli, Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta, "Integrating axiomatic design and robust design" (2007). Masters Theses. 34.
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/34