Masters Theses
Integrating axiomatic design and robust design
Abstract
"In this thesis, three publications are presented that evaluate two design methodologies, Robust Design and Axiomatic Design, and give a detailed comparison of both methodologies. The comparison lies on the fundamental presumption that both the design methodologies address the system Concept Design as well as Product Design"--Abstract, page iv.
Advisor(s)
Ragsdell, K. M.
Committee Member(s)
Takai, Shun
Grasman, Scott E. (Scott Erwin)
Department(s)
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
Degree Name
M.S. in Engineering Management
Publisher
University of Missouri--Rolla
Publication Date
Fall 2007
Journal article titles appearing in thesis/dissertation
- Quality systems and tools - an organizational perspective
- Similarities and differences between axiomatic design and robust design
- Integrating assembly feasibility with information axiom and quality loss function
Pagination
xi, 75 pages
Rights
© 2007 Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta Tadepalli, All rights reserved.
Document Type
Thesis - Citation
File Type
text
Language
English
Subject Headings
Axiomatic set theory -- EvaluationEngineering -- Quality controlEngineering design -- EvaluationNew products -- Development
Thesis Number
T 9150
Print OCLC #
173491310
Recommended Citation
Tadepalli, Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta, "Integrating axiomatic design and robust design" (2007). Masters Theses. 34.
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/34
Share My Thesis If you are the author of this work and would like to grant permission to make it openly accessible to all, please click the button above.
