Location

San Diego, California

Presentation Date

29 Mar 2001, 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm

Abstract

The seismic active and passive earth pressure problems are investigated by means of the kinematical method of the limit analysis theory. Two rotational kinematically admissible failure mechanisms M1 and M2 are proposed. Quasi-static representation of earthquake effects using the seismic coefficient concept is adopted. The solutions obtained are rigorous upper-bound ones in the framework of the limit analysis theory. The numerical results of the seismic active and passive earth pressure coefficients are presented and compared with other authors’ results. These results improve the best available upper-bound solutions given by Chen and Liu (1990) in the active case and Soubra (2000) in the passive case. The best upper-bound solutions as given by the different upper-bound approaches are presented for practical use in geotechnical engineering.

Department(s)

Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering

Meeting Name

4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics

Publisher

University of Missouri--Rolla

Document Version

Final Version

Rights

© 2001 University of Missouri--Rolla, All rights reserved.

Creative Commons Licensing

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

File Type

text

Language

English

Share

COinS
 
Mar 26th, 12:00 AM Mar 31st, 12:00 AM

Seismic Active and Passive Earth Pressures on Rigid Retaining Structures by a Kinematical Approach

San Diego, California

The seismic active and passive earth pressure problems are investigated by means of the kinematical method of the limit analysis theory. Two rotational kinematically admissible failure mechanisms M1 and M2 are proposed. Quasi-static representation of earthquake effects using the seismic coefficient concept is adopted. The solutions obtained are rigorous upper-bound ones in the framework of the limit analysis theory. The numerical results of the seismic active and passive earth pressure coefficients are presented and compared with other authors’ results. These results improve the best available upper-bound solutions given by Chen and Liu (1990) in the active case and Soubra (2000) in the passive case. The best upper-bound solutions as given by the different upper-bound approaches are presented for practical use in geotechnical engineering.