Location
St. Louis, Missouri
Presentation Date
14 Mar 1991, 2:00 pm - 3:30 pm
Abstract
Accurate assessment of material properties is essential for a meaningful evaluation of the dynamic behavior of a dam. Comprehensive studies using in- situ measurement and laboratory testing techniques coupled with back calculations of dam responses in recorded motion gives the following conclusions : (1) Response in good agreement with actual motion can be obtained by using appropriate analytical models and material properties; (2) a laboratory test may give reasonable result, but allowance should be made for the effects of strain level, sample disturbance and reconsolidation, especially in loose, non - cohesive soil; (3) in- situ shear wave velocity measurement is considered to be the most representative technique and gives the best estimation in Gmax.
Department(s)
Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering
Meeting Name
2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics
Publisher
University of Missouri--Rolla
Document Version
Final Version
Rights
© 1991 University of Missouri--Rolla, All rights reserved.
Creative Commons Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Document Type
Article - Conference proceedings
File Type
text
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Chern, J. C.; Wang, M. T.; and Lee, T. S., "Assessment of Dynamic Properties of Wushantou Dam" (1991). International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. 4.
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/02icrageesd/session07/4
Included in
Assessment of Dynamic Properties of Wushantou Dam
St. Louis, Missouri
Accurate assessment of material properties is essential for a meaningful evaluation of the dynamic behavior of a dam. Comprehensive studies using in- situ measurement and laboratory testing techniques coupled with back calculations of dam responses in recorded motion gives the following conclusions : (1) Response in good agreement with actual motion can be obtained by using appropriate analytical models and material properties; (2) a laboratory test may give reasonable result, but allowance should be made for the effects of strain level, sample disturbance and reconsolidation, especially in loose, non - cohesive soil; (3) in- situ shear wave velocity measurement is considered to be the most representative technique and gives the best estimation in Gmax.
