Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Date

02 Jun 1993, 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm

Abstract

Because of its descriptive properties physical modelling belongs to one of the most prospective means for assessment of behaviour of soils and rocks. Its disadvantage is a poor description of stress fields in the material. This difficulty can be partly avoided by means of mathematical modelling mainly by comparison of both the models. The coupled modelling brings also about new views on the statements of constitutive relations, here following Drucker, Prager, 1952, also Brož, Procházka, 1987, mathematical background e.g. Duvant, Lions, 1972. For more details of physical modelling see e.g. Vacek, 1991, another application of coupled modelling see e.g. Vacek, Procházka, 1992. The coupled modelling were testified on the landslide described in the sequel.

Department(s)

Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering

Meeting Name

3rd Conference of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering

Publisher

University of Missouri--Rolla

Document Version

Final Version

Rights

© 1993 University of Missouri--Rolla, All rights reserved.

Creative Commons Licensing

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

File Type

text

Language

English

Share

 
COinS
 
Jun 1st, 12:00 AM

Development of Landslide at CSA-Open Mine in Bohemia

St. Louis, Missouri

Because of its descriptive properties physical modelling belongs to one of the most prospective means for assessment of behaviour of soils and rocks. Its disadvantage is a poor description of stress fields in the material. This difficulty can be partly avoided by means of mathematical modelling mainly by comparison of both the models. The coupled modelling brings also about new views on the statements of constitutive relations, here following Drucker, Prager, 1952, also Brož, Procházka, 1987, mathematical background e.g. Duvant, Lions, 1972. For more details of physical modelling see e.g. Vacek, 1991, another application of coupled modelling see e.g. Vacek, Procházka, 1992. The coupled modelling were testified on the landslide described in the sequel.