Comparison of Adaptive Critic-Based and Classical Wide-Area Controllers for Power Systems
This document has been relocated to http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ele_comeng_facwork/927
There were 26 downloads as of 27 Jun 2016.
Abstract
An adaptive critic design (ACD)-based damping controller is developed for a thyristor-controlled series capacitor (TCSC) installed in a power system with multiple poorly damped interarea modes. The performance of this ACD computational intelligence-based method is compared with two classical techniques, which are observer-based state-feedback (SF) control and linear matrix inequality $hbox{LMI-H}^{infty}$ robust control. Remote measurements are used as feedback signals to the wide-area damping controller for modulating the compensation of the TCSC. The classical methods use a linearized model of the system whereas the ACD method is purely measurement-based, leading to a nonlinear controller with fixed parameters. A comparative analysis of the controllers' performances is carried out under different disturbance scenarios. The ACD-based design has shown promising performance with very little knowledge of the system compared to classical model-based controllers. This paper also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of ACDs, SF, and $hbox{LMI-H}^{infty}$.
