Considering Stakeholder Perspectives in an Integrated Resilience Framework

Abstract

Existing resilience frameworks focus on specific domains or contexts, which limit their generalizability. In addition, these resilience frameworks do not effectively aggregate stakeholder inputs to inform decision-making. This creates challenges in a resilience planning process. The proposed resilience framework integrates current frameworks and can be customized to fit specific needs and contexts. The framework includes six resilience domains including physical, information, cognitive, social, environmental, and economic. These six domains were chosen based on their coverage in existing resilience frameworks and through insights gained from a literature review. Stakeholder input is gathered, compared, and integrated across stakeholder groups by considering stakeholder opinions of resilience decisions, such as resilience shortfalls, current perceived resilience, or specific resilience improvement projects. Both qualitative and quantitative inputs are obtained from stakeholders and a resilience assessment is created providing information for prioritization. This resilience framework may then be applied using multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework supports more equitable decision-making across multiple stakeholder groups for complex systems.

Department(s)

Engineering Management and Systems Engineering

Comments

Army Research Laboratory, Grant W911NF-22-2-0182

Keywords and Phrases

Aggregation Strategy; Equity; Hazards; Resilience; Resilience Framework; Stakeholder Opinions

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

Document Version

Citation

File Type

text

Language(s)

English

Rights

© 2026 American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM), All rights reserved.

Publication Date

01 Jan 2024

This document is currently not available here.

Share

 
COinS