TOGAF vs.. DoDAF: Architecting Frameworks for Net-Centric Systems
Abstract
The subsystem components of a net-centric system are developed from hard core engineering disciplines; however, there is a need to architect large net-centric systems from a Systems Engineering view point. the complexity inherent in network-centric systems arises not only from the number of components, but also from the diversity and real-time data exchanges required. Architecting such a system could be challenging because of the existence of several architecting frameworks. DoDAF has become the "de facto" standard for Systems Architecting. This paper briefly discusses TOGAF and DoDAF, and compares the two, in modeling a net-centric architecture. Future work is also mentioned.
Recommended Citation
N. Umeh et al., "TOGAF vs.. DoDAF: Architecting Frameworks for Net-Centric Systems," IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2007 - Industrial Engineering's Critical Role in a Flat World - Conference Proceedings, pp. 322 - 327, Scimago Journal & Country Rank, Dec 2007.
Department(s)
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
Keywords and Phrases
Architecture framework; Availability; DoDAF; Enterprise framework; Net-centricity; Network enabled capability; Network-centric system; Operational view; Some keywords used in this paper include: Net-centric system; Systems view; Technical view; TOGAF
Document Type
Article - Conference proceedings
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2024 Scimago Journal & Country Rank, All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Dec 2007