TOGAF vs.. DoDAF: Architecting Frameworks for Net-Centric Systems

Abstract

The subsystem components of a net-centric system are developed from hard core engineering disciplines; however, there is a need to architect large net-centric systems from a Systems Engineering view point. the complexity inherent in network-centric systems arises not only from the number of components, but also from the diversity and real-time data exchanges required. Architecting such a system could be challenging because of the existence of several architecting frameworks. DoDAF has become the "de facto" standard for Systems Architecting. This paper briefly discusses TOGAF and DoDAF, and compares the two, in modeling a net-centric architecture. Future work is also mentioned.

Department(s)

Engineering Management and Systems Engineering

Keywords and Phrases

Architecture framework; Availability; DoDAF; Enterprise framework; Net-centricity; Network enabled capability; Network-centric system; Operational view; Some keywords used in this paper include: Net-centric system; Systems view; Technical view; TOGAF

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

Document Version

Citation

File Type

text

Language(s)

English

Rights

© 2024 Scimago Journal & Country Rank, All rights reserved.

Publication Date

01 Dec 2007

This document is currently not available here.

Share

 
COinS