Abstract
The integration of energy storage into FACTS devices lead to increased controller flexibility by providing decentralized active power capabilities. Combined FACTS/ESS can improve power flow control, oscillation damping and voltage control. This paper presents a comparison between the dynamic performance of a StatCom, a StatCom/BESS, an SSSC, an SSSC/BESS and a UPFC. Experimental verification is also presented.
Recommended Citation
L. Zhang et al., "A Comparison of FACTS Integrated with Battery Energy Storage Systems," Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (2001, Atlanta, GA), vol. 2, pp. 1151 - 1155, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Nov 2001.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2001.971421
Meeting Name
2001 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (2001: Oct. 28-Nov. 2, Atlanta, GA)
Department(s)
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Sponsor(s)
National Science Foundation (U.S.)
Sandia National Laboratories
Keywords and Phrases
FACTS; STATCOM; UPFC; Battery Energy Storage Systems; Battery Storage Plants; Control System Analysis; Controller Flexibility; Decentralised Control; Decentralized Active Power Capabilities; Dynamic Performance; Flexible AC Transmission Systems; Load Flow Control; Oscillation Damping; Power Control; Power Flow Control; Power System Dynamic Stability; Power Transmission Control; Voltage Control
International Standard Book Number (ISBN)
0-7803-7285-9
Document Type
Article - Conference proceedings
Document Version
Final Version
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2001 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), All rights reserved.
Publication Date
01 Nov 2001
Comments
Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant ECS-9988868 and Sandia National Laboratories under BD-0071-D