Abstract

The principal ethical obligation of the engineering profession, to "hold paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public," has been challenged for decades. Professor P. Aarne Vesilind identified two primary deficiencies: an anthropocentric bias that values nature only instrumentally and the use of non-mandatory, aspirational language for environmental protection, which resulted in the exclusion of enforceable environmental canons. This paper argues that two recent developments provide a comprehensive response to Vesilind's recommendations for engineering ethics. First, the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics has redefined environmental engineering as "developing solutions to problems of planetary health." Second, Oerther proposed a revised paramountcy clause in the Journal of Environmental Engineering: "Engineers hold paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public and the planet." This study demonstrates that elevating planetary health to the same level as public welfare directly addresses Vesilind's principal critiques. It transforms the commitment to planetary health from aspirational advocacy into an enforceable, ecocentric, and foundational approach essential for contemporary environmental engineering in the 21st century and for realizing Vesilind's vision of Peace Engineering.

Department(s)

Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering

International Standard Book Number (ISBN)

978-078448693-1

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

Document Version

Citation

File Type

text

Language(s)

English

Rights

© 2026 American Society of Civil Engineers, All rights reserved.

Publication Date

01 Jan 2026

Download

Full Text Link

Share

 
COinS