Abstract

We investigate the impact of gubernatorial re-election incentive and political factors on US public pension funds from 1990 to 2022. Our empirical analysis finds no significant overall relationship between gubernatorial re-election incentives and local bias in the full sample. However, the effect of gubernatorial re-election incentives on local bias is influenced by a state's level of corruption. Specifically, in states within the lowest corruption quantile, governors eligible for re-election tend to prioritize local investments to gain consistent support. In contrast, in states within the highest corruption quantile, heightened scrutiny may encourage re-election-eligible governors to adopt conservative investment policies that do not significantly influence local bias. Although re-election incentives may encourage politically motivated local investments in low-corruption states, they do not necessarily lead to negative outcomes. Instead, in these states, governors seeking re-election appear to positively influence pension fund performance and investment expenses, suggesting that electoral accountability may help align political incentives with prudent investment management. Additionally, we find that a change in the state governor's party affiliation is negatively associated with local bias, and Democratic governors appear to mitigate the impact of re-election incentives on local investment across both high- and low-corruption states. Other political variables do not exhibit statistically significant relationships with local bias.

Department(s)

Business and Information Technology

Publication Status

Open Access

Keywords and Phrases

corruption; local bias; political economy; public pension funds; re-election incentives

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

1097-0053; 1044-8136

Document Type

Article - Journal

Document Version

Citation

File Type

text

Language(s)

English

Rights

© 2026 Wiley, All rights reserved.

Publication Date

01 Jan 2026

Share

 
COinS