Integrating axiomatic design and robust design
"In this thesis, three publications are presented that evaluate two design methodologies, Robust Design and Axiomatic Design, and give a detailed comparison of both methodologies. The comparison lies on the fundamental presumption that both the design methodologies address the system Concept Design as well as Product Design"--Abstract, leaf iv.
Ragsdell, K. M.
Grasman, Scott E. (Scott Erwin)
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
M.S. in Engineering Management
University of Missouri--Rolla
Journal article titles appearing in thesis/dissertation
- Quality systems and tools - an organizational perspective
- Similarities and differences between axiomatic design and robust design
- Integrating assembly feasibility with information axiom and quality loss function
xi, 75 leaves
© 2007 Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta Tadepalli, All rights reserved.
Thesis - Citation
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Axiomatic set theory -- Evaluation
Engineering -- Quality control
Engineering design -- Evaluation
New products -- Development
Print OCLC #
Link to Catalog Record
Full-text not available: Request this publication directly from Missouri S&T Library or contact your local library.http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu/record=b5999139~S5
Tadepalli, Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta, "Integrating axiomatic design and robust design" (2007). Masters Theses. 34.
This document is currently not available here.