Integrating axiomatic design and robust design
"In this thesis, three publications are presented that evaluate two design methodologies, Robust Design and Axiomatic Design, and give a detailed comparison of both methodologies. The comparison lies on the fundamental presumption that both the design methodologies address the system Concept Design as well as Product Design"--Abstract, page iv.
Ragsdell, K. M.
Grasman, Scott E. (Scott Erwin)
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
M.S. in Engineering Management
University of Missouri--Rolla
Journal article titles appearing in thesis/dissertation
- Quality systems and tools - an organizational perspective
- Similarities and differences between axiomatic design and robust design
- Integrating assembly feasibility with information axiom and quality loss function
xi, 75 pages
© 2007 Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta Tadepalli, All rights reserved.
Thesis - Citation
Axiomatic set theory -- Evaluation
Engineering -- Quality control
Engineering design -- Evaluation
New products -- Development
Print OCLC #
Link to Catalog Record
Full-text not available: Request this publication directly from Missouri S&T Library or contact your local library.http://merlin.lib.umsystem.edu/record=b5999139~S5
Tadepalli, Siva Rama Jagadish Chandra Gupta, "Integrating axiomatic design and robust design" (2007). Masters Theses. 34.
Share My Thesis If you are the author of this work and would like to grant permission to make it openly accessible to all, please click the button above.