Combined Flue Gas Cleanup Process for Simultaneous Removal of SOₓ, NOₓ, and CO₂ - A Techno-Economic Analysis
Flue gas cleanup often requires the removal of SOₓ, NOₓ, and CO₂ in separate units before being emitted into the atmosphere. This stepwise treatment process incurs significant cost and energy penalty to the electricity production. A combined adsorption process based on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) by which these impurities are removed is envisioned as an efficient means of flue gas cleanup that can be applied relatively easily. In this study, the technological and economic feasibilities of a combined separation process in which SOₓ, NOₓ, and CO₂ are simultaneously removed from flue gas streams are assessed. Capital and operating costs are estimated based on sizing the equipment items and utilities needed, and the potentials for increased energy efficiency are determined in relation to the required PSA performance. The energy saving potential for the adoption of 2-bed and 4-bed PSA cycles is compared with conventional FGD, SCR, and amine scrubbing units needed to clean up flue gas in a stepwise fashion. The results show that energy savings can be expected when the PSA removal efficiency is greater than 90%. In the case of a 550 MW coal-fired power plant, the proposed system will impose an energy penalty of 24% to the cost of electricity, which is lower than that of current individual treatment units associated with SOₓ, NOₓ, and CO₂ removal. This energy penalty corresponds to a cleanup cost of $57/ton of all impurities captured for a 2-bed, four-step PSA process with a cycle time of 400 s, adsorption and desorption pressures of 10 and 1 bar, respectively, and a purge flow rate of 100 mol/s. This techno-economic assessment shows that the integrated combined system can be an attractive technology compared to multi-step systems for the removal of flue gas impurities.
A. N. Hajari et al., "Combined Flue Gas Cleanup Process for Simultaneous Removal of SOₓ, NOₓ, and CO₂ - A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energy & Fuels, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 4165-4172, American Chemical Society (ACS), Apr 2017.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02881
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
Keywords and Phrases
Adsorption; Carbon Dioxide; Coal; Costs; Economic Analysis; Energy Conservation; Flue Gases; Flues; Fossil Fuel Power Plants; Gases; Operating Costs; Removal; Adsorption and Desorptions; Capital and Operating Costs; Economic Feasibilities; Electricity Production; Energy Saving Potential; Pressure Swing Adsorption; Techno-Economic Analysis; Techno-Economic Assessment; Energy Efficiency
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
Article - Journal
© 2017 American Chemical Society (ACS), All rights reserved.
01 Apr 2017