Incorporation of evidences in an intelligent argumentation network for collaborative engineering design
"Conflicts among stakeholders are unavoidable in the process of collaborative engineering design, and resolution of these conflicts is challenging. Previous research by thesis research group developed a web based intelligent collaborative system that provides decision-making support using computational argumentation techniques. Enhancements were done to this system to incorporate the priorities of the stakeholders and detect conflicting arguments. In an effort to make this system more effective and objective, the present work develops a method to assess the effect of evidences in the argumentation network using the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and fuzzy logic. One or more evidences can support or attack an argument or another evidence. Incorporation of evidences in the argumentation network makes the decision making process more objective by re-assessing the weights assigned to the arguments according to the evidences associated with them. This research also explains how the present work permits design rationale capturing,. The success of any project is dependent on the decision made during the design phase, making these decisions critical. It is important, therefore, to record the deliberations--Abstract, leaf iii.
Liu, Xiaoqing Frank
Cheng, Maggie Xiaoyan
Leu, M. C. (Ming-Chuan)
M.S. in Computer Science
Missouri University of Science and Technology
vi, 39 leaves
© 2008 Ekta Khudkhudia, All rights reserved.
Thesis - Citation
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Conflict management -- Mathematical models
Print OCLC #
Link to Catalog Record
Full-text not available: Request this publication directly from Missouri S&T Library or contact your local library.http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu/record=b6664311~S5
Khudkhudia, Ekta, "Incorporation of evidences in an intelligent argumentation network for collaborative engineering design" (2008). Masters Theses. 75.
This document is currently not available here.