Location
Chicago, Illinois
Date
02 May 2013, 2:00 pm - 3:30 pm
Abstract
Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are a popular choice amongst piling contractors due to the ability to readily adjust pile lengths to suit the depth of penetration required. Despite their widespread use, there is a dearth of published data on the axial load behavior of temporary-cased DCIS piles, particularly in cohesionless soils. This paper reports the results of a static compression load test on a 340 mm nominal diameter, 5.75 m long DCIS pile in a dense sand deposit in Shotton, Wales. The test pile was instrumented with vibrating-wire strain gauges at various levels to determine the shaft and base resistance during loading. Analysis of the test results showed that pile behavior was predominantly end-bearing, with the base resistance accounting for approximately 81 % of the total capacity at a displacement of 10 % of the pile diameter. The pile exhibited a stiff stress-displacement response during the initial stages of loading due to the level of pre-stress applied to the soil beneath the base during driving of the steel installation tube. The displacement required to mobilize the shaft resistance was similar to that reported for preformed displacement piles, with a peak local shaft friction of 105 kPa occurring near the base of the pile which diminished with increasing distance from the tip. Finally, the load test results were compared with two popular CPT-based design methods (LCPC and Imperial College methods) for displacement piles in sand. Despite having specific empirical correlations for DCIS piles, the LCPC method significantly under-predicted the capacity of the test pile.
Department(s)
Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering
Meeting Name
7th Conference of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering
Publisher
Missouri University of Science and Technology
Document Version
Final Version
Rights
© 2013 Missouri University of Science and Technology, All rights reserved.
Creative Commons Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Document Type
Article - Conference proceedings
File Type
text
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Flynn, Kevin N.; McCabe, Bryan A.; and Egan, Derek, "Axial Load Behavior of a Driven Cast-In-Situ Pile in Sand" (2013). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 4.
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/7icchge/session02/4
Axial Load Behavior of a Driven Cast-In-Situ Pile in Sand
Chicago, Illinois
Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are a popular choice amongst piling contractors due to the ability to readily adjust pile lengths to suit the depth of penetration required. Despite their widespread use, there is a dearth of published data on the axial load behavior of temporary-cased DCIS piles, particularly in cohesionless soils. This paper reports the results of a static compression load test on a 340 mm nominal diameter, 5.75 m long DCIS pile in a dense sand deposit in Shotton, Wales. The test pile was instrumented with vibrating-wire strain gauges at various levels to determine the shaft and base resistance during loading. Analysis of the test results showed that pile behavior was predominantly end-bearing, with the base resistance accounting for approximately 81 % of the total capacity at a displacement of 10 % of the pile diameter. The pile exhibited a stiff stress-displacement response during the initial stages of loading due to the level of pre-stress applied to the soil beneath the base during driving of the steel installation tube. The displacement required to mobilize the shaft resistance was similar to that reported for preformed displacement piles, with a peak local shaft friction of 105 kPa occurring near the base of the pile which diminished with increasing distance from the tip. Finally, the load test results were compared with two popular CPT-based design methods (LCPC and Imperial College methods) for displacement piles in sand. Despite having specific empirical correlations for DCIS piles, the LCPC method significantly under-predicted the capacity of the test pile.
