Location

New York, New York

Date

17 Apr 2004, 10:30am - 12:30pm

Abstract

Several sites in the Seattle area of Washington incorporated ground improvement as liquefaction mitigation or to increase bearing capacity prior to the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. Facilities with improved ground include an earthen dam, a waste repository embankment, lightweight and large plan structures, and bridge columns and approaches. The sites were improved using vibro-replacement stone columns, vibroflotation, or deep dynamic compaction. All sites performed extremely well, despite evidence of liquefaction and minor structural damage nearby. In this paper, 10 sites are summarized, and the performance of three sites located near liquefied or damaged areas will be described in detail. The detailed sites include a large plan commercial property on liquefiable fill improved to a limited lateral extent, a lightweight tilt-up structure located near evidence of liquefaction at King County International Airport, and an earthen dam with its toe retrofitted using vibro-replacement stone columns.

Department(s)

Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering

Meeting Name

5th Conference of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering

Publisher

University of Missouri--Rolla

Document Version

Final Version

Rights

© 2004 University of Missouri--Rolla, All rights reserved.

Creative Commons Licensing

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Document Type

Article - Conference proceedings

File Type

text

Language

English

Share

 
COinS
 
Apr 13th, 12:00 AM Apr 17th, 12:00 AM

Performance of Improved Ground During the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake

New York, New York

Several sites in the Seattle area of Washington incorporated ground improvement as liquefaction mitigation or to increase bearing capacity prior to the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. Facilities with improved ground include an earthen dam, a waste repository embankment, lightweight and large plan structures, and bridge columns and approaches. The sites were improved using vibro-replacement stone columns, vibroflotation, or deep dynamic compaction. All sites performed extremely well, despite evidence of liquefaction and minor structural damage nearby. In this paper, 10 sites are summarized, and the performance of three sites located near liquefied or damaged areas will be described in detail. The detailed sites include a large plan commercial property on liquefiable fill improved to a limited lateral extent, a lightweight tilt-up structure located near evidence of liquefaction at King County International Airport, and an earthen dam with its toe retrofitted using vibro-replacement stone columns.